Vivo X200 alternatives
Tap above to see alternatives.
Xiaomi 15 alternatives
Tap above to see alternatives.
1x3.63 GHz Cortex-X925
3x3.3 GHz Cortex-X4
4x2.4 GHz Cortex-A720
2x4.32 GHz Oryon V2 Phoenix L
6x3.53 GHz Oryon V2 Phoenix M
16GB 512GB (UFS 4.0)
f/1.6, 23mm (wide), 1/1.56", PDAF, OIS
50 MP
f/2.6, 70mm (periscope telephoto), 1/1.95", PDAF, OIS, 3x optical zoom
50 MP
f/2.0, 15mm, 119˚ (ultrawide), 1/2.76", 0.64µm, AF
f/1.6, 23mm (wide), 1/1.31", 1.2µm, OmniVision Light Fusion 900, dual pixel PDAF, OIS
50 MP
f/2.0, 60mm (telephoto), 1/2.76", 0.64µm, S5KJN5, PDAF (10cm - ∞), OIS, 2.6x optical zoom
50 MP
f/2.2, 14mm, 115˚ (ultrawide), 1/2.76", 0.64µm, Samsung S5KJN1
1080p
4K@24/30/60fps
1080p@30/60/120/240/960fps
720p@1920fps
f/2.0, 20mm (ultrawide)
f/2.0, 21mm (wide), 1/3.14", 0.7µm, OmniVision OV32B40
1080p@30/60fps
1080p@30/60fps
SIM1: Nano, SIM2: Nano
SIM1: Nano, SIM2: Nano
FDD: N1, N3, N5, N8, N28
TDD: N40, N77, N78
FDD: N1, N2, N3, N5, N7, N8, N12, N20, N25, N26, N28
TDD: N38, N40, N41, N48, N66, N75, N77, N78
FDD: N1, N3, N5, N8, N28
TDD: N40, N77, N78
FDD: N1, N2, N3, N5, N7, N8, N12, N20, N25, N26, N28
TDD: N38, N40, N41, N48, N66, N75, N77, N78
In this comparison, the Vivo X200 with the Mediatek Dimensity 9400 (3nm) performs better than the Xiaomi 15 with the Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite (3nm), thanks to its more efficient chipset.
They offer the same OS update support. When it comes to security updates, Xiaomi 15 leads with 6 years of support.
Both phones feature AMOLED displays. They have the same 120 Hz refresh rate. Vivo X200 also has a brighter display with 4500 nits, improving outdoor visibility. Notably, Vivo X200 has a higher resolution display, resulting in sharper visuals.
Vivo X200 has a larger 5800 mAh battery for longer usage. They support 90W wired charging. Xiaomi 15 supports wireless charging at 50W, while Vivo X200 lacks this feature.
Vivo X200 offers better water and dust resistance with an IP69 rating.