Samsung Galaxy F16 alternatives
Tap above to see alternatives.
Vivo Y39 alternatives
Tap above to see alternatives.
Samsung Galaxy F16

Samsung Galaxy F16
-
Dimensity 6300
6 nm
-
5000 mAh
25W
-
6.7"
1080 x 2340 pixels
-
50 MP
1080p@30fps
2x2.4 GHz Cortex-A76
6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55
2x2.2 GHz Cortex-A78
6x1.95 GHz Cortex-A55
6GB 128GB
8GB 128GB
8GB 256GB (UFS 2.2)
f/1.8, (wide), 1/2.76", 0.64µm, AF
5 MP
f/2.2, (ultrawide), 1/5.0", 1.12µm
2 MP
f/2.4, (macro)
f/1.8, (wide), PDAF
2 MP
f/2.4, (depth)
f/2.0, (wide), 1/3.1", 1.12µm
f/2.0, (wide)
SIM1: Nano, SIM2: Nano (Hybrid)
SIM1: Nano, SIM2: Nano
FDD: N1, N3, N5, N7, N8, N28, N66
TDD: N40, N41, N77, N78
FDD: N1, N3, N5, N8, N28
TDD: N40, N77, N78
FDD: N1, N3, N5, N7, N8, N28, N66
TDD: N40, N41, N77, N78
FDD: N1, N3, N5, N8, N28
TDD: N40, N77, N78
In this comparison, the Vivo Y39 with the Qualcomm Snapdragon 4 Gen 2 (4nm) performs better than the Samsung Galaxy F16 with the Mediatek Dimensity 6300 (6nm), thanks to its more efficient chipset.
The Samsung Galaxy F16 offers 6 years of OS updates, while the Vivo Y39 provides 2 years. When it comes to security updates, Samsung Galaxy F16 leads with 6 years of support.
Samsung Galaxy F16 has a superior AMOLED display, while Vivo Y39 uses an LCD panel. Moreover, Vivo Y39 offers a higher 120 Hz refresh rate for smoother scrolling. Vivo Y39 also has a brighter display with 1000 nits, improving outdoor visibility. Notably, Samsung Galaxy F16 has a higher resolution display, resulting in sharper visuals.
Vivo Y39 has a larger 6500 mAh battery for longer usage. Vivo Y39 supports faster wired charging at 44W.
Vivo Y39 offers better water and dust resistance with an IP64 rating.