Samsung Galaxy A06 4G alternatives
Tap above to see alternatives.
Vivo X200 Pro alternatives
Tap above to see alternatives.
Samsung Galaxy A06 4G

Samsung Galaxy A06 4G
-
Helio G85
12 nm
-
5000 mAh
25W
-
6.7"
720 x 1600 pixels
-
50 MP
1080p@30/60fps
Vivo X200 Pro

Vivo X200 Pro
-
Dimensity 9400
3 nm
-
6000 mAh
90W
-
6.78"
1260 x 2800 pixels
-
50 MP
8K@30fps
2x2.0 GHz Cortex-A75
6x1.8 GHz Cortex-A55
1x3.63 GHz Cortex-X925
3x3.3 GHz Cortex-X4
4x2.4 GHz Cortex-A720
4GB 128GB (eMMC 5.1)
6GB 128GB (eMMC 5.1)
f/1.8, (wide), AF
2 MP
f/2.4, (depth)
f/1.6, 23mm (wide), 1/1.28", 1.22µm, PDAF, OIS
200 MP
f/2.7, 85mm (periscope telephoto), 1/1.4", 0.56µm, multi-directional PDAF, OIS, 3.7x optical zoom, macro 2.7:1
50 MP
f/2.0, 15mm, 119˚ (ultrawide), 1/2.76", 0.64µm, AF
4K@30/60/120fps
1080p
f/2.0
f/2.0, 20mm (ultrawide)
1080p@30/60fps
SIM1: Nano, SIM2: Nano
SIM1: Nano, SIM2: Nano
FDD: N1, N2, N3, N5, N7, N8, N12, N20, N25, N26, N28
TDD: N38, N40, N41, N66, N77, N78
TDD N38 / N40 / N41 / N66 / N77 / N78
In this comparison, the Vivo X200 Pro with the Mediatek Dimensity 9400 (3nm) performs better than the Samsung Galaxy A06 4G with the Mediatek Helio G85 (12nm), thanks to its more efficient chipset.
The Vivo X200 Pro offers 4 years of OS updates, while the Samsung Galaxy A06 4G provides 2 years. When it comes to security updates, Vivo X200 Pro leads with 5 years of support.
Vivo X200 Pro has a superior AMOLED display, while Samsung Galaxy A06 4G uses an LCD panel. Moreover, Vivo X200 Pro offers a higher 120 Hz refresh rate for smoother scrolling. Vivo X200 Pro also has a brighter display with 4500 nits, improving outdoor visibility. Notably, Vivo X200 Pro has a higher resolution display, resulting in sharper visuals.
Vivo X200 Pro has a larger 6000 mAh battery for longer usage. Vivo X200 Pro supports faster wired charging at 90W. Vivo X200 Pro supports wireless charging at 30W, while Samsung Galaxy A06 4G lacks this feature.
Vivo X200 Pro has an IP69 rating, while Samsung Galaxy A06 4G lacks official water and dust resistance.