Poco C75 alternatives
Tap above to see alternatives.
Vivo X200 Pro alternatives
Tap above to see alternatives.
Vivo X200 Pro
Vivo X200 Pro
-
Dimensity 9400
3 nm
-
6000 mAh
90W
-
6.78"
1260 x 2800 pixels
-
50 MP
8K@30fps
2x2.0 GHz Cortex-A78
6x1.8 GHz Cortex-A55
1x3.63 GHz Cortex-X925
3x3.3 GHz Cortex-X4
4x2.4 GHz Cortex-A720
f/1.8, (wide)
Auxiliary lens
f/1.6, 23mm (wide), 1/1.28", 1.22µm, PDAF, OIS
200 MP
f/2.7, 85mm (periscope telephoto), 1/1.4", 0.56µm, multi-directional PDAF, OIS, 3.7x optical zoom, macro 2.7:1
50 MP
f/2.0, 15mm, 119˚ (ultrawide), 1/2.76", 0.64µm, AF
4K@30/60/120fps
1080p
f/2.2, (wide)
f/2.0, 20mm (ultrawide)
1080p@30/60fps
SIM1: Nano, SIM2: Nano
SIM1: Nano, SIM2: Nano
FDD: N1, N3, N5, N8, N28
TDD: N40, N78
FDD: N1, N2, N3, N5, N7, N8, N12, N20, N25, N26, N28
TDD: N38, N40, N41, N66, N77, N78
FDD: N1, N3, N5, N8, N28
TDD: N40, N78
FDD: N1, N2, N3, N5, N7, N8, N12, N20, N25, N26, N28
TDD: N38, N40, N41, N66, N77, N78
In this comparison, the Vivo X200 Pro with the Mediatek Dimensity 9400 (3nm) performs better than the Poco C75 with the Qualcomm Snapdragon 4s Gen 2 (4nm), thanks to its more efficient chipset.
The Vivo X200 Pro offers 4 years of OS updates, while the Poco C75 provides 2 years. When it comes to security updates, Vivo X200 Pro leads with 5 years of support.
Vivo X200 Pro has a superior AMOLED display, while Poco C75 uses an LCD panel. They have the same 120 Hz refresh rate. Vivo X200 Pro also has a brighter display with 4500 nits, improving outdoor visibility. Notably, Vivo X200 Pro has a higher resolution display, resulting in sharper visuals.
Vivo X200 Pro has a larger 6000 mAh battery for longer usage. Vivo X200 Pro supports faster wired charging at 90W. Vivo X200 Pro supports wireless charging at 30W, while Poco C75 lacks this feature.
Vivo X200 Pro offers better water and dust resistance with an IP69 rating.